Listening Log

Music I have listened to recently

BAROQUE FORMS

Suite – A set of pieces that are linked together into a single work. During the baroque period, the suite usually referred to a set of stylised dance pieces.

Partita – Baroque term for a set of variations on a melody or bassline.

Short interview I came across with Murray Perahia where both him and the interviewer come to agree that a partita is essentially the same as a suite. Also interesting to note how some movements evolve over time, e.g. the Sarabande was once a fast dance and considered almost lewd and lustful and banned at some point before becoming the slow stately dance that we are more familiar with.
Murray Perahia on Bach’s Partitas (Murray Perahia Interview)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2Feg4521%5F001
(Accessed 24/04/18)

Variations – Form that presents an uninterrupted series of variants (each called a variation) on a theme; the theme may be a melody, a bassline, a harmonic plan, or other musical subject.

Fugue – (from Italian ‘fuga’, “flight”) composition, or section of a composition in imitative texture that is based on a single subject and begins with successive statements on the subject in voices.

Cantata – (Italian, “to be sung”) 1. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, a vocal chamber work with continuo, usually for solo voice, consisting of several sections or movements that include recitativo and arias and setting a lyrical or quasi dramatic text. 2. Form of Lutheran church music in the 18th century, combining poetic texts with texts drawn from chorales or the Bible, and including recitatives, arias, chorale settings, and usually one or more choruses.

Concerto – (from Italian concertare, “to reach agreement”). 1. In the 17th century, ensemble of instruments or of voices with one or more instruments, or a work for such an ensemble. 2. Composition in which one or more solo instruments, or instrumental group, contrasts with an orchestral ensemble.

Concerto grosso – Instrumental work that exploits the contrast in sonority between a small sample of solo instruments (concertino), usually the same forces that appeared in the Trio sonata, and large ensemble (ripieno or concerto grosso)

Sonata da camara or chamber Sonata – Baroque Sonata, usually a suite of stylized dances, scored for one or more treble instruments and continuo.

Sonata da chiesa or church Sonata – baroque sonata, baroque instrumental work intended for performance in church, usually in four movements slow-fast-slow-fast and scored for one or more treble instruments and continuo.

Oratorio – Genre of dramatic music that originated in the 17th century, combining narrative, dialogue, and commentary through arias, recitatives, ensembles, choruses, and instrumental music, like an unstaged opera. Usually on a religious or biblical subject.

Mass (from Latin missa, “dismissed”) – 1. The most important service in the Roman church. 2. A musical work setting the texts of the Ordinary of the Mass, typically Kyrie, Gloria, credo, sanctus, and Agnus Dei.

Chaconne – Baroque genre derived from the chaconna, consisting of variations over a basso continuo.

Canzona (Italian ‘song’) – 1. 16th century Italian genre, an instrumental work adapted from a ‘chanson’ or composed in a similar style. 2. In the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, an instrumental work in several contrasting sections, of which the first and some of the others are in imitative counterpoint.

Passion – A musical setting of one of the biblical accounts of Jesus’ crucifixion, the most common type of Historia.

Motet (from French mot, ‘word’) – polyphonic vocal composition, the specific meaning changes over time. The earliest motets add a text to an existing discant clausula. 13th century motets feature one or more voices, each with its own sacred or secular text in Latin or French, above a tenor drawn from chant or other melody. Most 14th and some 15th century motets feature isorhythm and may include a contratenor. From the 15th century on, any polyphonic setting of a Latin text (other than a mass) could be called a motet. From the late 16th century on, the term was also applied to Sacred compositions in German and later in other languages.

Passacaglia – Baroque genre of variations over a repeated bass line or harmonic progression in triple metre.

All the above definitions have come out of the glossary in this book:
Burkholder, J. P., Grout, D. J., & Palisca, C. V. (2014). A history of western music (Ninth edition.). New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc..

Decided to listen to a partita, cantata, mass, sonata da chiesa and a passacaglia as forms I’m less familiar with.

More or less randomly I chose to listen to this Bach partita played on the piano by Murray Perahia who I had not heard of before. I like his interpretation.

Partita

Partita No. 3 in A Minor, BWV 827
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F3885649
(Accessed 24/04/18)
The first movement, fantasia, sounds immediately like Bach: The discourse between the hands / voices, the independent but inter-related melodic lines, and the continuous stream of notes. It sounds a rather like some his 2 part inventions for keyboard.
The Allemande is rather more sedate with a little less of the ‘stream of notes’ and more articulated and phrased lines, still with this 2 voice polyphony coming through.
Corrente is a slightly livelier affair with some very articulated playing with contrasts of legato and staccato in the lines.
Sarabande is a gentle understated piece with quieter dynamics on the piano.
This is contrasted with the burlesca that opens up in a dramatic fashion with a quick arpeggiated chord followed by some fast flowing lines complete with baroque ornaments and some quite exciting rising sequences that add drama to the music. Very nice.
Scherzo – The name of this movement is a surprise to me: I had it in mind that the Scherzo as a piece of music was more of a late classical or romantic invention. Essentially this is a lively rhythmic motif that Bach explores in this short piece that’s a minute in length.
Gigue – Dance-like triplet feel in 12/8 with some quite catchy moments with rising sequences, circle of fifths sequences and the familiar polyphonic texture.

In the same interview as above it turns out that these partitas were the first group of works that J.S.Bach published when he was in Leipzig. They were published in 1727 (IMSLP) and consisted of 6 keyboard partitas under the title Clavier-Ubung, ‘apparently in acknowledgment of the work of his predecessor as Thomas-Kantor in Leipzig, Johann Kuhnau, whose two sets of Clavier-Ubungen had appeared in 1689 and 1692′ (Liner notes Naxos CD 8.550312, David Nelson). I have heard of Kuhnau and indeed I have played at least one work of his on the piano, but didn’t know that he was Bach’s predecessor in Leipzig.

Also of note is the changing meaning of the word partita as the liner notes go on to explain: The choice of the word partita as a title for the suites that form the first volume of the Clavier-Ubung again echoes Kuhnau, whose Neue Clavier-Ubung had consisted of seven Partiten, a use of the word that was to become current in Germany, although originally it seems to have been used in Italian to describe sets of variations…’ (Liner notes Naxos CD 8.550312, David Nelson)

Cantata

Bach, Johann Sebastian
Jauchzet Gott in allen Landen!, BWV 51 (Praise God in all lands!)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F711
(Accessed 24/04/18)
Scored for Trumpet, 2 violins, viola, soprano, basso continuo.
Gets off to a lively start in the aria, trumpet sounding repeated notes in a quasi-pedal fashion, closely following the 1st violin part, and this occurs throughout the first movement. My initial momentary reaction to the singing (as anyone who read my opera blog will know) was not good and I was anticipating the warbling… However, I very much enjoyed the singing – it’s quite a tune and in this instance I like the mellismatic style of singing and the lively accompaniment. It’s proper foot-tapping stuff.
Change of mood for the recitative as a more plaintive feel is conveyed by the slower tempo and sparser texture of voice, organ, and cello.
The next aria starts off with quiet organ and a cello arpeggiating its way through what sounds like a circle of fifths progression in a similar texture and tempo to the previous recitative. It sounds structurally as if it might be a chaconne but on reading some analyses it is described as a ‘basso quasi-ostinato’ (http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Pic-Rec-BIG/Suzuki-C30c%5BBIS-SACD1471%5D.pdf).
The chorale brings a lighter change of mood with more emphasis on the two violins which then segues into the finale with a return to the more mellismatic singing and bigger texture as the trumpet joins the fray once more.

The liner notes of the Naxos CD state that this cantata was written for performance on the fifteenth sunday after Trinity, possibly 17th September 1730, in Leipzig. However other sources suggest that it might have been performed for that occasion but that the work originated at a different time: ‘The scoring for solo trumpet, according to the customs of the Baroque era, was associated more with special festivities in church, public or court circles than with a regular Sunday service during Trinity…’ The demanding soprano part and the text of the cantata also point to a work that was composed for an altogether different occasion, possibly the Weissenfels court. Bach composed a number of cantatas for the Duke Christian of Sachsen-Weissenfels and he may have used this one on different occasions. Sometimes an over-worked composer has to take shortcuts!

References:

Click to access Suzuki-C30c%5BBIS-SACD1471%5D.pdf

Liner notes from Naxos CD 8.550643 – Keith Anderson

Mass

Machaut, Guillaume de (c1300 – 1377)
La Messe de Nostre Dame
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F8595
(Accessed 25/04/18)
I know that this is an important work in the history of Western music but I wasn’t too sure why. It was composed in the early 1360s. Burkholder et al state that ‘La Messe de Nostre Dame was one the earliest polyphonic settings of the Mass Ordinary, probably the first polyphonic mass to be written by a single composer and conceived as a unit’. Machaut was both a poet and a musician and had the support and patronage of John of Luxembourg, King of Bohemia, and subsequently his daughter and other patrons. He settled in Reims in 1340 and worked as canon of the cathedral. Machaut seems to have been exceptional in the sense that he had an idea of his own creative worth and made efforts to preserve his works for posterity – and had the resources to do so. He lived during the ‘Ars Nova’ (New Art) period, named after Philippe de Vitry (1291 – 1361) who wrote, or at least was partly responsible for, a treatise on the new French musical style – something I will likely explore further in the ‘dissonance in music’ section.

Kyrie – All male choir, 4 voices, polyphonic, long held notes, mellismatic, with the ‘Triplum’ voice having the most ‘lively’ part. Certain difficulty in following the score.
Gloria – There is more ‘rhythmically together’ singing in the Gloria compared to the Kyrie where I would describe the parts as being more independent. Some interesting harmonies and cadences and generally livelier than the Kyrie with examples of hocketing towards the end. Mix of time signatures throughout the score: 2/2, 3/2, 4/2. This also occurs in the Credo.
Credo – Starts with a single bass voice enunciating ‘Credo’, though my score does not reflect this (also in the Gloria), further confusing me initially! More interesting cadences and harmonies.
Sanctus – seems to me like the Kyrie in the way the voices move.
Agnus Dei – In ‘perfect’ 3/2 time throughout.
Ita Missa Est – Also in 3/2 with the same interesting cadences and harmonies. The final cadence Em (rootless Cmaj7?) to F (without the 3rd) complete with parallel 5ths!!! In fact, looking at the other parts of the mass I notice that the Sanctus ends in a very similar cadence. The Gloria and Kyrie also finish with parallel octaves and 5ths!
I enjoyed listening to this – very unusual to my ears and definitely not something I would normally to – unless I was doing a music course 🙂
There are also examples of Isorhythms in this work. What this means is that the rhythm of the parts repeat, but the notes in the rhythm change. e.g. in the Agnus Dei bb31-46. The rhythm of each part repeats every 3 bars in this instance.

References:

Click to access MachautIsorhythmAll.pdf

Burkholder, J. P., Grout, D. J., & Palisca, C. V. (2014). A history of western music (Ninth edition.). New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc..

Sonata da Chiesa

Corelli, Arcangelo
Sonata a 3 in F Major, Op. 1, No. 1
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F3496018

Very short slow opening movement to this sonata. Indeed the whole sonata is just 6 minutes long. Delicate violin lines with echoed fugal like motifs at times, with gentle accompaniment provided by lute. Just 2 violins, cello and lute. Slow-fast-slow-fast tempo to the movements. It’s all very tuneful stuff and ‘suitable’ for performance in church.

Corelli’s set of 12 trio sonatas were published in 1681. According to the liner notes these trio sonatas ‘became an important landmark in the development of Western classical music…It was through this set and his subsequent 5 operas that Corelli established himself as of the most celebrated and influential composers in Europe’. They were published by the Roman publisher Giovanni Angelo Mutij and subsequently published around Europe and remained in print throughout the 18th century. They have been described as ‘sonata da chiesa’ though Corelli never referred to them as such, but rather used the term ‘sonata a tre’, and they were not conceived specifically for church. Corelli followed these up with another set of trio sonatas, the Op.2 of 1685, which are of the ‘da camara’ type. Another point of note is that there some doubt about quite which bass instrument Corelli intended to be used. The bass part was originally written for ‘violone’ or archlute, but ‘violone’ did not refer to to the violoncello but some kind of bass violin though there were at least 3 different sizes of bass violin at the time.

Liner notes Linn CD CKD414, Simon D.I. Fleming.

Sonata da camara

Corelli, Arcangelo
Sonata, Op. 2, No. 4
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F4852959
(Accessed 25/04/18)
Use of the harpsichord as the continuo in a sedate and rather melancholic Adagio opening movement.
Second movement Allemanda: Lively second movement where the violin and continuo set out a sprightly motif that lays the foundation to the Allegro movement. The rhythmic motif is echoed through the first Allegro section. This is then quickly followed by a Grave and adagio sections where muted arpeggios are laid out by the harpsichord with long legato violin lines on top.
Giga – Dancelike final movement
Particularly like the opening to the Allemanda and the muted harpsichord that follows, though the mute is only on for the very short Grave before the Adagio proper.

Passacaglia

Handel, George Frideric
Passacaglia / Keyboard Suite No. 7 in G Minor, HWV 432
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F6348
(Accessed 26/04/18)
I first heard this Passacaglia last year, in-built on an electronic piano keyboard as an aid for learning. It spurred me on to listen to the whole suite and buy the sheet music.
The piece is based on a four bar pattern consisting of a descending circle of fifths in different inversions Gm – Cm – F – Bb – Eb – Adim – D – Gm.
Dotted chordal opening of the Passacaglia, followed by a similar dotted rhythm of of the right hand with a walking-bass accompaniment in octaves, followed by an arpeggio of the chords in the right-hand… Essentially the same chord progression is explored in different playing styles.

The passacaglia is taken from suite number 7 in G minor which was part of a collection of 8 great suites first published in London in 1720. Handel himself explains why he wishes to publish the suites:

‘I have been obliged to publish some of the following lessons because surreptitious and incorrect copies of them had got abroad. I have added several new ones to make the Work more usefull which if it meets with a favourable reception: I will still proceed to publish more reckoning it is my duty with small talent to serve a Nation from which I have receiv’d so generous a protection’. (Handel – Eight Great Suites, Book II: Suites Nos 5, 6, 7 and 8. ABRSM publications 1986 ISBN 978-1-85472-297-3).

Handel assembled the eight suites from a variety of mainly older material. Nos 1, 4, 5 and 8 already existed as dance-suites whereas part of the no.7 suite (a former prelude, the andante and the allegro) along with suites 2 and 6 were originally Italianate sonatas and contain very few dance forms. The full eight suites indeed provide contrasting examples of the French and Italian styles.

References:

Liner notes from Naxos CD 8.550416, Alan Cuckston.
Introduction by Richard Jones: Handel – Eight Great Suites, Book II: Suites Nos 5, 6, 7 and 8. ABRSM publications 1986 ISBN 978-1-85472-297-3.

Also a version for cello and violin:

RENAISSANCE COMPOSERS

BYRD: Consort and Keyboard Music / Songs and Anthems

Byrd, William
Pavan
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F01
(accessed 28/04/18)
Sedate polyphonic music played by viols.
Galliard
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F02
(accessed 28/04/18)
The Pavane and Galliard are both Renaissance dances and it was common to play them as pairs. A favourite combination was a slow dance in duple meter followed by a fast dance in triple meter. They have a modal flavour like much of the music on this CD.

Susanna fair
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F03
(accessed 28/04/18)
Rejoice unto the Lord
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F04
(accessed 28/04/18)
Both of the above tracks sound essentially like old english folk music accompanied by viols. It’s all rather sedate and quite tuneful but frankly I find it boring.
‘Rejoice unto the Lord’ was written for the 28th anniversary of Elizabeth’s accession to the throne.
In the radio program below, Don Macleod explains that ‘Susanna fair’ is about two lecherous voyeurs looking to have their way with Susanna. This rather brings the music to life but it’s still not something I would listen to!

John come kiss me now (from The Fitzwilliam Virginal Book)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F05
(accessed 28/04/18)
Fairly lively polyphonic harpsichord music full of mordents and trills. Not a million miles away from something J.S.Bach might write though again I think it has more of a modal Renaissance flavour. Some virtuosic sounding passages. Virginals were popular instruments at the time and something that ladies were encouraged to play in a similar parallel to the piano in the 19th century.

Fantasia No. 2
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F06
(accessed 28/04/18)
Viol consort. It all sounds rather ‘flat’ to me, the parts all blend in nicely and there don’t to be any big cadence points or big changes in dynamics and it sounds like a continuous stream of pleasant harmonies that ‘don’t go anywhere’. It’s pleasant enough but that’s about all I can say about it.

Have mercy upon me, O God
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F07
(accessed 28/04/18)
Polyphonic choir piece. Same comments as above though there is a bit more contrast between the male and female voices and quite a nice resolution to the voices at the end of the piece.

In Nomine No. 2
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F08
(accessed 28/04/18)
Viol consort in much the same style as fantasia No.2.

In angel’s weed
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F09
(accessed 28/04/18)

Fair Britain isle
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F271848%5F10
(accessed 28/04/18)

It’s all starting to sound the same and I am not particularly enthused.

Biography

William Byrd was a composer who straddled the reign of several monarchs during what were religiously turbulent times. He lived through the Gunpowder plot of 1605. He was a contemporary of William Shakespeare. Born in London in 1540 during the reign of Henry VIII, he would go on to see several monarchs ascend to the throne – Edward VI, Mary I, James I, but most importantly – Elizabeth I who was on the throne for much of his working life and was an important supporter of his work. He died in 1623.

Two of his brothers became choristers at St.Paul’s cathedral for a time and it is possible that he joined the Chapel Royal around 1550. Some of his musical training would have been overseen by Thomas Tallis. In 1563 he became organist of Lincoln cathedral and in 1572 he he was sworn in as a Gentleman of the Chapel Royal.

Byrd was a Catholic, a religion that was effectively outlawed in England at the time, and court records show that he found himself in trouble with the authorities on a fairly regular basis. Attendance at chuch of England ceremonies since 1558 when Elizabeth ascended to the throne was enforced by law. Byrd was a recusant who remained loyal to the Roman Catholic church and did not attend Church of England ceremonies. It was the direct intervention of Elizabeth I that prevented him being thrown in jail for any length of time.

Indeed, this support from the monarch was visible at other times in his life, when he was gifted property, as well as a Royal Patent granted to him and Thomas Tallis, for the printing and publishing of music. This was something of a financial disaster initially: much of what they published remained unsold for many years. A second attempt some years later proved altogether more successful.

Byrd was a versatile composer who could write a Latin Motet one day, keyboard dance the next, a solemn viol accompanied song, pieces for viols alone and even the occasional ‘erotic’ song. Byrd also composed music for liturgical use by Catholics who celebrated Mass in secret.

‘His masses, one each for three, four, and five voices (c.1593-95) stand out as the finest by an English Renaissance composer.’ (Burkholder et al).

References

Donald Macleod explores the life and work of William Byrd
https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/d1cf7a39-f268-45e8-bbc0-6cea5c0272cf

Click to access IMSLP277645-PMLP396040-02-susanna_faire—0-score.pdf

Burkholder, J. P., Grout, D. J., & Palisca, C. V. (2014). A history of western music (Ninth edition.). New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

I also checked out an example of Pavane and Galliard dancing:

The Galliard is a rather livelier affair than the Byrd example from the article above, and contains a variety of instrumental textures that I like.

PERIOD ORCHESTRA

Compare at least two works played by a period and a modern ensemble. Listen in particular to the difference in instrumental sounds; how is the balance between the parts different? Do any of the instruments have a different tone quality from modern instruments? If so in what ways? Do you notice any differences in the emotional quality or clarity of pitch?

MOZART, W.A.: Horn Concertos (Complete) (R. Montgomery, Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment, Faultless)
Horn Concerto No. 2 in E-Flat Major, K. 417
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F3344159
(accessed 28/01/18)
My initial immediate reaction to this recording is that is sounds a bit rough and ready. More the mix than anything else being off exactly, but then my ears quickly get used to it. The horn seems fairly closely mic’d. The horn sounds like it does not have the same power as a modern instrument – in the upper range specifically. Maybe?
The legato lines of the horn sound very smooth and nice and I’m already anticipating how those are going to sound on a modern instrument. I’m imagining that it won’t be as legato somehow because of the valves…

Horn Concerto No. 1 in D Major, K. 412
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F3347084
(accessed 28/01/18)
Nothing more to add than already stated above.

MOZART, W.A.: Horn Concertos Nos. 1-4 (Allegrini, Orchestra Mozart, Abbado)
Horn Concerto No. 2 in E-Flat Major, K. 417
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F4360964
(accessed 28/01/18)
The recording sounds more polished and ‘fuller’ with more bottom end.
The horn sounds darker and less ‘brassy’. I can hear the clicking of the valves from the horn player. The trills on the horn sound slightly different, the lines sound ‘cleaner’ with more separation of notes, and it’s less breathy. I far prefer the first recording with a period horn as it seems to be more ‘alive’ and has a brighter tone.
I can’t hear any specific differences with the other instruments of the orchestra between the 2 recordings, though as I say, the second recording sounds more ‘polished’. I’d say the winds can be heard more clearly in the Age of Enlightenment orchestra and provide more of an interesting texture whereas they blend in more with the rest of the orchestra in the Abbado recording.
I very much like these horn concertos – it’s difficult not to hum along!

Horn Concerto No. 1 in D Major, K. 412
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F4360963
(accessed 28/01/18)

BEETHOVEN, L. van: Symphony No. 5 (Orchestre Révolutionnaire et Romantique, Gardiner)
Symphony No. 5 in C Minor, Op. 67
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F4461741
(accessed 28/01/18)
Opening movement is WAY TOO FAST 🙂
I would not have been able to say that this was a period orchestra until way into the first movement when there’s a moment when just 2 bassoons are playing and it sounds more like a strangled goose noise than anything else!!!
In the opening of the second movement I would say that the flute is not heard quite so prominently in the upper register as in a modern orchestra.
There’s a kind of prominence to the ‘brassiness’ of the sound in the third movement compared to the modern orchestral version below. It sounds like the horns cut through more, whereas in the modern version they actually have to play louder to get the same effect. Difficult to tell if that’s right or not, more of an impression than anything else.
This happens again in the fourth movement, as already described in the Mozart horn concertos, the brass sounds more ‘alive’. The timbre of winds and the horns do sound different to modern instruments but I can’t really say anything more specifically about quite what the difference is.

Zagreb Philharmonic Orchestra|Edlinger, Richard
Symphony No. 5 in C Minor, Op. 67
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F1630
(accessed 28/01/18)
Very nice recording, I could really hear the interplay of the winds in the second movement that I wasn’t even aware of in the Gardiner version. I notice that they have omitted a repeat section in the third movement compared to Gardiner’s version.
Again, the sound is somehow more ‘polished’ than the period orchestra version.

OTHER CLASSICAL COMPOSERS

Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven are the ‘big names’ of the Classical era, but this shouldn’t blind you to the work of the many other important composers working in this period. Write down the names and dates of some other composers of the era and choose one or two to research in more depth, and listen to examples of their work. What links, if any, do your chosen composers have with the three major composers considered here?

Other classical composers:

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (1714 – 1788)
Johann Christian Bach (1735 – 1782)
Muzio Clementi (1752 – 1832)
Christoph Gluck (1714 – 1787)
Luigi Cherubini (1760 – 1842)
Antonio Salieri (1750 – 1825)

A couple of classical guitar composers I recognise:
Fernando Sor (1778 – 1839)
Mauro Giuliani (1781 – 1829)

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_classical_music_composers_by_era#Classical_era

Bach, Johann Christian
Keyboard Concerto in E-Flat Major, Op. 7, No. 5, C59
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F144355
(accessed 22/01/18)
The slurred notes towards the beginning of this concerto, as well as scalic runs later, and the Alberti bass, are reminiscent of Mozart, though of course it’s Mozart that partly acquired his style from Bach, not the other way round.
Pizz strings in some of the 3rd movement give an unexpected texture.
Particularly enjoyed the outer movements and the period instruments – a very catchy motif in the opening movement.

Bach, Johann Christian
Keyboard Concerto in G Major, Op. 7, No. 6, C60
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F144356
(accessed 22/01/18)
Not nearly as exciting as the Eb concerto.

Bach, Johann Christian
Bassoon Concerto in B-Flat Major, C83
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F1117453
(accessed 22/01/18)
Written in 1770, the same year as the above keyboard concertos, this bassoon concerto uses the harpsichord as the continuo instrument, not the piano. The cadential trills sound like Mozart. Part of it reminded me of a Mozart horn concerto.

Bach, Johann Christian (1735–1782)

J.C.Bach was the sixth and youngest son of Johann Sebastian Bach.

He was probably educated at the Thomasschule, Leipzig, where his father worked as Kantor at St Thomas’s Church.

After his father’s death in 1750, Johann Christian moved to Berlin, where his half-brother Carl Philipp Emanuel assumed responsibility for his welfare and education. His first surviving large-scale compositions, including five keyboard concertos, date from his years in Berlin, where he also gained renown as a harpsichordist.

In 1755 J.C.Bach travelled to Italy where he took counterpoint lessons with Padre Martini in Bologna. He concerted to Catholicism and composed several Roman Catholic church works and gained a Milanese patron, Count Agostino Litta. He became ‘second organist’ at Milan Cathedral in 1760.

It was through the medium of opera that he became renowned. Three Italian operas: Artaserse (1760), Catone in Utica (1761), and Alessandro nell’ Indie (1762), were successful enough that it prompted an invitation to compose two works for the King’s Theatre in London. In 1762 Bach travelled to London, where he spent the remaining twenty years of his life as the dominant musical figure in the city, thereby earning the sobriquet ‘the London Bach’. Bach became music master to Queen Charlotte, he taught the harpsichord to the royal family, and organised the queen’s chamber music concerts.

Bach collaborated with his compatriot Carl Friedrich Abel and inaugurated a series of subscription concerts during the mid 1760s. These continued into the next decade when the Bach–Abel concerts moved in 1775 to the lavish Hanover Square rooms. At these concerts many of Bach’s works were given their first performances. He composed predominantly in the galant style that was popular at the time.

Bach did much to champion the pianoforte, an instrument that was much in development at the time. The sonatas from op. 5 are apparently the first works published in England to specify the piano on the title-page.

Although J.C.Bach was acquainted with many great men of his age such as Sir Joshua Reynolds, Thomas Gainsborough (who painted his portrait), Charles Burney, and Denis Diderot, he appears not to have met many other composers. Handel had died some years earlier and seems to have left something of a gap in English music. The foremost exception is that he met Leopold and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart on their visit to London in 1764–5. Bach is reputed to have performed duets with the eight-year-old Wolfgang. Mozart was much influenced by Bach’s music and arranged three of Bach’s sonatas into concertos.

Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
Burkholder, J. P., Grout, D. J., & Palisca, C. V. (2014). A history of western music (Ninth edition.). New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

ENJOYING CLASSICAL MUSIC

Work your notes up into a set of listening notes for someone who has no musical knowledge – perhaps a child or someone who has only ever listened to jazz or popular music. Avoid specialised musical terminology – the idea is to get you to listen to and describe the music at an elemental level, experiencing it as early concert-goers might have done. For your first effort, it’s probably best to concentrate either on composition or instrumentation.

I concentrated on instrumentation when writing this up:

Haydn, Franz Joseph
Symphony No. 94 in G Major, Hob.I:94, “The Surprise”
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F6666
(accessed 15/01/18)
This symphony is divided into 4 movements.
The first movement starts with a gentle conversation starter by the woodwinds, followed by a reply by the strings. After a minute or so the music becomes livelier and you can hear the double-bass, cello, and timpani more prominently. There are then sections where the oboe can be heard. Notice a solo oboe playing a trill accompanied by a flute and oboe at about 3 minutes in before the strings come in again. A lot of prominence is given to the violins that have the most ‘exciting’ lines, though there is a moment when the woodwinds get a word in, with a cheeky bassoon at the bottom accompanying flute and oboe. The horns can be heard more obviously in the louder sections.

The second movement starts with violins quietly playing a very simple nursery-rhyme tune which is interrupted by a brief ‘oi!’ from the orchestra, particularly timpani and horns. Gradually the flutes join in, the violins start playing other little motifs on top, with the winds joining in. Strings and oboe play the nursery-rhyme theme in livelier fashion, then a bit later the strings and horns until the strings, horns, and winds play the simple motif towards the end of the movement. The nursery rhyme tune is quietly at the end by the woodwinds – listen for the bassoon, oboe and flute in particular at the very end of piece.

The third movement is a waltzing dance-like movement. Listen to the lyrical winds between the more rhythmic string sections and the addition of the winds and horns on beats 2 and 3 of the dance theme. Also listen to how the orchestra sometimes all play the same thing together, and in contrast, how one instrument will play an idea only for it to repeated by a different

The strings and violins start the lively fourth movement. Haydn varies the instrumentation: there’s the addition of a flute, then a bassoon and flute, sometimes just a basson, until the horns and remaining woodwinds are added and play long held notes whilst the strings whirl around underneath. Big timpani roll towards the end of the movement. Lots of fast playing by the violins creates a sense of movement throughout.

Classical listening log

Gallo, Domenico
12 Trio Sonatas: No. 1 in G Major
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F2736353
(Accessed 10/03/18)
Gallo, Domenico
12 Trio Sonatas: No. 7 in G Minor: III. Allegro
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2Fei9110%5F001
(Accessed 10/03/18)
Pergolesi, Giovanni Battista
Sinfonia a 3 in F Major
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F5632932
(Accessed 10/03/18)
Listened to the above in preparation for the analysis of Pulcinella and neo-classicism for assignment 4.

Haydn, Joseph
Symphony 104 in D major
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01pqdgz
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F3732418
(Accessed 09/03/18)
A performance and introductory commentary on the last of Haydn’s 12 London Symphonies, number 104 ‘The London Symphony’.
Stephen Johnson examines different theories to explore why this symphony is the only one to be called ‘The London Symphony’. Some anecdotes about how Haydn considered London to be very noisy and how he misses the calm and tranquility of Vienna as evidenced in correspondence. He also draws parallels between the different views of London as seen by Haydn’s contemporaries, Dr.Johnson and William Blake, and the contrasting sections within the movements and within the symphony itself. He also argues that Haydn waits until the second movement of this symphony to create the real dramatic weight in the music, rather than the first movement, as was customary at the time, and this also presages something that Beethoven would do in his symphonies.

Adagio – Presto: Dramatic, grand fanfare unison opening – somewhat dark introduction. This is then contrasted by a bouncy ‘major’ allegro section in cut time which always makes it more fun to follow the score as it moves along at lightning speed 😉
Andante – Change of key to G major. A seemingly quite jolly tune by the strings ambles along for a bit with the addition of a bassoon, and hints at something darker. Contrasting quiet wind textures and forte tutti sections. Some ‘searching’ sections… The jolly tune is slightly bent out of shape by the end.
Dynamic & cheerful dance-like menuet that quietens down in the middle but ends with a flourish. Some echoed lines between the bassoon and winds.
Allegro Spiritoso – Long held pedal note on D by the horns and lower strings before the spirited entry of the violins joined shortly after by the oboes…

Sammartini, Giovanni Battista
Symphony in A Major, J-C 62
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F41518
(Accessed 08/02/18)
The liner notes reckon that this work dates from about 1750. Sounds correspondingly Baroque with the Basso Continuo; could be Handel or J.S.Bach. Presto first movement, with chugging quavers on the accompanying instruments with violins playing the melody and trumpets providing added texture. Occasional semi-quavered outlined arpeggiated chords.
Slow second movement, somewhat homophonic texture but some independence in the lines making it sound contrapuntal at times. Very pleasant.
There are 2 versions of the third movement (based on seven copies found dispersed around Europe). Six of them show a Presto Assai third movement which sounds very much like the first movement. The remaining copy from Genoa is scored for horns rather than trumpets and is in the form of a minuet.

Sammartini, Giovanni Battista
Symphony in C Minor, J-C 9
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F102287
(Accessed 08/02/18)
Dotted rhythm in 3/4 of the first movement that bounces along quite happily despite the minor key.
More sedate second movement where the violins have all the action.
Final Allegro movement in 3/8 with unison violins.
The whole piece takes less than 10 minutes to perform.

Sammartini, Giovanni Battista
Symphony in D Major, J-C 16
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F102289
(Accessed 08/02/18)
Alla Breve first movement has a march-like feel to it with repeated motifs that are echoed in a loud – soft way, and a prominent dotted bouncy rhythm to the melody.
Andante sempre piano – pretty much says it all. Flowing legato violin lines.
Presto – A bit more ‘space’ in the violin lines so that there is a bit more of a question and answer type of conversation with the rest of the orchestra.
The whole symphony lasts less than seven minutes.

Instruments of the Orchestra (The) (Siepmann)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F35286
(Accessed 08/02/18)
Listened to this over the course of several days (and at the time of writing I haven’t quite finished – It’s over 7 hours long!)
Provides an insight into the different tones and techniques that the instruments of the modern orchestra are capable of, with a wide variety of musical examples from different eras.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
Concerto for Flute and Harp in C Major, K. 299
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F39992
(Accessed 30/01/18)
Lovely texture of the harp that tends to alternate with the continuo harpsichord. Opening of the first movement is reminiscent of Eine Kleine Nachtmusik. The usual Mozart stylistic techniques are present – largely homophonic style, echoed lines, conversational style, music full of ‘grammar and punctuation’, crescendos at important cadence points, etc. Not wanting to be disparaging of Mozart’s genius but it starts to sound very similar after a while.
Part of the melody in the second movement sounds like the melody from the second movement of his Piano Concerto No. 21, K. 467, “Elvira Madigan”.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
Flute Concerto No. 1 in G Major, K. 313
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F39993
(Accessed 29/01/18)

Krommer, Franz
Partita in E-Flat Major, Op. 45, No. 1, FVK 1
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F7678
(accessed 30/01/18)
First movement and indeed the whole piece sounds light, airy, gay, almost comic in places, particularly in parts when the bassoons, contrabasson, (and horns?), alternate between 2 notes.
More lyrical second movement with more staccato like accompaniment, but still with a lightness and airiness about it.
Dance-like menuet in 3/4 as expected, with some unexpected tutti syncopated moments.
There’s the repeated rhythmic motif of the main theme that the course notes refer to, &a1 &a2 etc… contrasted by the other rondo sections of the movement.
Very enjoyable to listen to this ‘Harmoniemusik’ consisting only of wind instruments – makes a change from the full orchestra.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
Le nozze di Figaro (The Marriage of Figaro), K. 492 (arr. J. Wendt) (excerpts)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F6218820
(accessed 30/01/18)
Overture
Cinque … dieci … venti … trenta
Se a caso Madama
Se vuol ballare, Signor Contino
Non più andrai, farfallone amoroso

I’m not sure if this is the recording the course notes are referring to, but it’s a wind arrangement of the ‘best of’ excerpts from The Marriage of Figaro.
Not nearly as much as ‘fun’ as the Krommer and I don’t think it works nearly as well the original orchestral arrangements. I prefer the original orchestral arrangements that have more power, dynamic contrast, and fullness to the sound, not to mention the voices.

Original orchestral arrangements:
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
Le nozze di Figaro, K. 492
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F42453
(accessed 30/01/18)
Sinfonia
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F660102%5F01
Act I No. 1: Duettino – Cinque…dieci…venti…trenta
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F660102%5F02
Act I No. 1: Recitativo – Cosa stai misurando
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F660102%5F03
Act I No. 2: Duettino – Se a caso madama la notte ti chiama
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F660102%5F04
Act I No. 10: Aria – Non più andrai, farfallone amoroso
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F660102%5F20

An Introduction to… MOZART The Magic Flute
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F34902
(accessed 30/01/18)
A few too many superlatives in the commentary, but interesting synopsis and highlights of The Magic Flute.

Die Zauberflote (The Magic Flute), K. 620 (excerpts)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F26539
(accessed 30/01/18)

 

Bach, Johann Christian
Keyboard Concerto in E-Flat Major, Op. 7, No. 5, C59
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F144355
(accessed 22/01/18)
The slurred notes towards the beginning of this concerto, as well as scalic runs later, and the Alberti bass, are reminiscent of Mozart, though of course it’s Mozart that partly acquired his style from Bach, not the other way round.
Pizz strings in some of the 3rd movement give an unexpected texture.
Particularly enjoyed the outer movements and the period instruments – a very catchy motif in the opening movement.

Bach, Johann Christian
Keyboard Concerto in G Major, Op. 7, No. 6, C60
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F144356
(accessed 22/01/18)
Not nearly as exciting as the Eb concerto.

Bach, Johann Christian
Bassoon Concerto in B-Flat Major, C83
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F1117453
Written in 1770, the same year as the above keyboard concertos, this bassoon concerto uses the harpsichord as the continuo instrument, not the piano. The cadential trills sound like Mozart. Part of it reminded me of a Mozart horn concerto.

Symphonies of Italian composers

Salieri, Antonio
Sinfonia in D Major, “La Veneziana”
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F200172
(accessed 22/01/18)
The whole 3 movement symphony lasts 10 minutes!
Contrast with the instruments used: Second movement consists of strings only, whilst the winds and horns are more in evidence in the first and third movement. His style sounds like nothing I would associate with another composer.

Cimarosa, Domenico
Symphony in D Major
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2Fq14656%5F104
(accessed 22/01/18)
A one movement symphony!

Cimarosa, Domenico
Symphony for Flute, Oboe, Horn and Strings in D Major
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F202497
(accessed 22/01/18)
Symphony in 3 movements. Sounds quite dramatic and almost Romantic in attitude. The first movement reminds me of Beethoven more than anything else.

Paisiello, Giovanni
Symphony in D Major
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F206291
(accessed 22/01/18)
Symphony in 3 movements.
Second movement has some particularly quiet, slightly melancolic moments, that contrast well with the 2 outer movements.

Clementi, Muzio
Symphony in D Major, Op. 18
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F200175
(accessed 28/01/18)
Symphony in 4 movements.
‘The Symphony in D major is longer and seemingly more ambitious…as demonstrated by the Grave introduction with its dotted rhythm and tense harmonies. In the eighteenth-century symphony, a solemn introduction generally denoted the composer’s desire to write a piece of a certain weighty significance’
(NML work information: https://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/work.asp?wid=145327&cid=CDS79)
It’s pleasant enough, pleasant instrumentation, I like the use of the flutes and strings together in the first movement – sounds very classical.

Rossini, Gioachino
Sinfonia in D Major, “Bologna”
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2Fq14662%5F115
(accessed 28/01/18)
One movement symphony.
Thunderous timpani and brass opening sound like he means busines, but this immediately quietens down to a more lyrical quiet feel with pulsing strings and winds on top. Far more contrast than the Clementi in terms of instrumentation, mood, dynamics… Not surprising really as he is more of a Romantic composer.

Bellini, Vincenzo
Symphony in D Major
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2Fq14649%5F116
(accessed 28/01/18)
Lovely lyrical solo clarinet moments in the opening section to this one movement symphony. Sounds classical in a Mozart vein.

Donizetti, Gaetano
Symphony in D Major
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2Fq14636%5F117
(accessed 28/01/18)
One movement symphony.
Pizz strings opening with a reply by the winds sounds immediately interesting. This conversation continues during the introduction in 3/4, horns and strings then announce the start proper and we then have a 2/4 and 4/4 feel with different motifs that get bounced around the orchestra. Very nice. Memorable and catchy themes, light-hearted winds… I’d hazard a guess that this is late classical bordering on the romantic the way it ends. NML classify him as a Romantic composer.

Classical forms of composition

Ludwig van Beethoven
Symphony No. 1 in C Major, Op. 21
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F165165
(accessed 14/01/18)
Theme extracts from first movement:
Symphony_1_Theme1

Theme 2
Symphony_1_Theme2

Haydn, Franz Joseph
String Quartet No. 1 in B-Flat Major, Op. 1, No. 1, Hob.III:1
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F6559
(accessed 14/01/18)
I find it interesting to note that there are 2 minuet movements in this string quartet.
The adagio sounds more Baroque than Classical – could be Vivaldi.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Major, K. 467, “Elvira Madigan” (cadenza by M. Uchida)
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F5891293
(accessed 14/01/18)
There’s a brief string sequence and another piano motif in the first movement that actually reminds me of a song by Elton John!
Rather an understated performance by everybody concerned.

Also listened to a slightly more robust performance conducted by Claudio Abbado
Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Major, K. 467, “Elvira Madigan”
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F4360915
(accessed 14/01/18)

Beethoven, Ludwig van
String Quartet No. 1 in F Major, Op. 18, No. 1
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F1596
(accessed 14/01/18)
Particularly like the first movement with the imitation / call & response between the parts, and the transformation and development of the main motif.

Some thoughts that spring to mind comparing Beethoven with Mozart:
More DRAMA with Beethoven.
Mozart has ‘prettier’ melodies.
Very broadly speaking I would say that there is more interest in all the parts in Beethoven, with more polyphonic like texture with passages where the parts imitate and contrast / develop each other, whereas Mozart is broadly more homophonic in texture with more melody and accompaniment style passages.
I haven’t listened to enough Haydn to justify a comparison although Haydn’s first String Quartet is vastly different to Beethoven’s first strings quartet in that it is closer to the Baroque era in terms of the names of the movements and style of the pieces.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
String Quartet No. 17 in B-Flat Major, K. 458, “Hunt”
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F9620
(accessed 14/01/18)
Dedicated to Haydn.
The texture is generally thinner than Beethoven. There are similarities with Beethoven in the way the parts imitate each other, but there is less going on, to the point where the instruments imitate each other at times as ‘solos’ – with no harmony – which in itself provides some interest.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
String Quartet No. 6 in B-Flat Major, K. 159
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F9623
(accessed 14/01/18)
Some of the violin lines almost ‘swing’ in the first movement.

Life and Works – Haydn
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F39898
(accessed 15/01/18)
Over 4 hours of Haydn’s music and narration by Jeremy Siepmann.

Work your notes up into a set of listening notes for someone who has no musical knowledge – perhaps a child or someone who has only ever listened to jazz or popular music. Avoid specialised musical terminology – the idea is to get you to listen to and describe the music at an elemental level, experiencing it as early concert-goers might have done. For your first effort, it’s probably best to concentrate either on composition or instrumentation.

I concentrated on instrumentation when writing this up:

Haydn, Franz Joseph
Symphony No. 94 in G Major, Hob.I:94, “The Surprise”
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F6666
(accessed 15/01/18)
This symphony is divided into 4 movements.
The first movement starts with a gentle conversation starter by the woodwinds, followed by a reply by the strings. After a minute or so the music becomes livelier and you can hear the double-bass, cello, and timpani more prominently. There are then sections where the oboe can be heard. Notice a solo oboe playing a trill accompanied by a flute and oboe at about 3 minutes in, before the strings come in again. A lot of prominence is given to the violins that have the most ‘exciting’ lines, though there is a moment when the woodwinds get a word in, with a cheeky bassoon at the bottom end accompanying flute and oboe. The horns can be heard more obviously in the louder sections.

The second movement starts with violins quietly playing a very simple nursery-rhyme tune which is interrupted by a brief ‘oi!’ from the orchestra, particularly timpani and horns. Gradually the flutes join in, the violins start playing other little motifs on top, with the winds joining in. Strings and oboe play the nursery-rhyme theme in livelier fashion, then a bit later the strings and horns, until the strings, horns, and winds play the simple motif towards the end of the movement. The nursery rhyme tune is quietly played at the end by the woodwinds – listen for the bassoon, oboe and flute in particular at the very end of piece.

The third movement is a waltzing dance-like movement. Listen to the lyrical winds between the more rhythmic string sections, and the addition of the winds and horns on beats 2 and 3 of the dance theme. Also listen to how the orchestra sometimes all play the same thing together, and in contrast, how one instrument will play an idea only for it to repeated by a different one.

The strings and violins start the lively fourth movement. Haydn varies the instrumentation: there’s the addition of a flute, then a bassoon and flute, sometimes just a basson, until the horns and remaining woodwinds are added and play long held notes whilst the strings whirl around underneath. Big timpani roll towards the end of the movement. Lots of fast playing by the violins creates a sense of movement throughout.

Haydn, Franz Joseph
Symphony No. 6 in D Major, Hob.I:6, “Le matin”
http://imslp.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=167137%2Fimslpcomp01%2F6591
(accessed 16/01/18)
This symphony is divided into 4 movements.
I don’t know for sure, but I imagine this is groundbreaking music in the sense of the quiet, evolving start to the symphony, something that would have been unusual back in Haydn’s day when it was customary to start with a bang, so to speak. Beautiful beginning to the first movement evoking the sunrise, the dawn chorus, until things start chugging along with some lively violins. Love the banter between the winds. Frequent changes of texture and instrumentation. Still using harpsichord at this time.
Slow movement opens with a solo violin playing lyrical lines, contrasted at times with the orchestra playing more halting passages.
Prominent flute in the menuet contrasting with the strings of the prior movement, occasionally joined by the oboe and bassoon. The bassoon has some prominent moments too.
Lively final movement with lots of call and response phrases initially introduced by the flute and answered by the strings who then ‘steal’ the motif the flute had started with.

Some comments and analysis of Beethoven’s Fifth symphony.
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/music/music-masterpieces-old-new/ludwig-van-beethoven-music/v/ludwig-van-beethoven-part-1
(Accessed 18/01/18)

Opera and overtures

I have something of a love hate relationship with opera. The opera excerpts that have made it into ‘popular’ culture, e.g. Bizet’s Habanera from Carmen or Puccini’s Nessun Dorma from Turandot, I find fantastic.
I am in absolutely no doubt about the emotional power of opera, and of the combination of the orchestra, human voice and onstage drama to deliver something almost transcendental. But…
It’s just the singing. The warbling by the sopranos. The wholy unnatural style of opera singing. It takes some getting used to. Perhaps it’s just what you get used to or have grown up with, but to me at least, compared with the more natural way the pop and rock singers use their voice, opera singing comes across as slightly bombastic and pretentious. Perhaps I am gradually changing my mind…

George Bizet
Carmen
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F4766272
(Accessed 09/01/18)

(Accessed 09/01/18)
I’ve deliberately chosen what I think is an ‘easier’ opera to listen to.
A couple of recognisable tunes that I already knew: Prelude (contains teasers of highlights to come), Habanera, the Toreador song.
‘Allons Allons’ has something of nursery rhyme simplicity to it with jovial winds and children singing.
I like the way Bizet incorporates the military sounding brass whilst Carmen dances for don Jose towards the end of Act II (Je vais danser en votre honeur), highlighting the character’s conflicting motivations of love and duty, both on stage and through the music.

Overtures

Gioachino Rossini
La gazza ladra (The Thieving Magpie): Overture
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F231614%5F01
(Accessed 09/01/18)
Catchy march tune kicked off by snare roll.
The course notes state: ‘He used lyrical melodies, energetic rhythms and clarity of orchestration, combined with well-conceived structures…’. Yes, exactly.

Gioachino Rossini
Il barbiere di Siviglia (The Barber of Seville): Overture
(Accessed 09/01/18)
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F231614%5F02
Parts of this remind me of Mozart, particulary towards the beginning.

Gioachino Rossini
Guillaume Tell (William Tell): Overture
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F231614%5F08
(Accessed 09/01/18)
This starts off in quite a different mood to what I was expecting. Sombre and plaintive introduction followed by a dramatic ‘stormy’ sounding section. Lyrical woodwinds section and the mood gradually lightens until a trumpet call, echoed by the the horns, bring in the familiar catchy dance-like theme.

Luigi Cherubini
Faniska: Overture
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F557908%5F06
(Accessed 09/01/18)
I saw this performed at the RNCM and it’s really grown on me. I particularly like the call and response style of the violin with the rest of the orchestra.

Richard Wagner
Die Walkure, Act III: Ride of the Valkyries
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2Fpm6701%5F001
(Accessed 09/01/18)
Fantastic use of the orchestra at the beginning, full of anticipation and (for lack of a better word) ‘windiness’ 🙂

TRANSCRIBING FOR THE PIANO

Ludwig van Beethoven
Symphony No. 5 in C Minor, Op. 67
I. Allegro con brio
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F2447008
I. Allegro con brio
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2Fq79908%5F105
(Accessed 02/01/2018)

I listened to Sir Simon Rattle’s version of this symphony conducting the Wiener Philharmoniker orchestra. The opening of this symphony surely contains the 4 most difficult notes to conduct of any symphony. It is so well known and has been done at different tempos and phrasings that everyone has their own interpretation of how ‘it’s supposed to sound’. Case in point…I thought Rattle’s version was slightly too fast!!! If I listened to this on a different day it’s quite likely I’d change my mind 🙂

On listening to the full orchestral version of this piece it is difficult not to be struck by the power of the orchestra (even though it is relatively small compared to the orchestras of the later Romantics), the wide dynamic range, the contrast between the full orchestra and the occasional solo lyrical section such as the solo oboe in bar 268 (marked Adagio). Then of course you have the different timbre of the instruments that Beethoven has blended, and when playing the repeated 4 note motif each section adds it’s own flavour to the sound.

Allegro con brio
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/stream.asp?s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2Fq79908%5F105

On listening to the piano version there are several things that strike me. First off I’m impressed at how good it sounds! In the hands of a good pianist the different flavour of the parts comes through with different piano touches. It’s also easier to hear the overall harmony and in some ways it sounds even more beautiful than the symphonic version. The repeated motif is easier to pick out in the bass part when the upper parts are playing a different melody in bb 63-91 for example. But what you gain in clarity, you lose in texture, where the melody is bounced around the flutes and clarinets for example.
Beethoven5th

Score extract courtesy of http://www.musedata.org/beethoven/sym-5/

There are other parts that are lost when the piece is transcribed for the piano, most notably in the winds and horns that can have a completely different attack to the sound of the piano, and can grow louder as the players blow harder, whereas the piano has a fixed attack and decay. In modern synth parlance the Attack, Decay, Sustain and Release of the piano is narrowly fixed when compared to the other instruments of the orchestra that can all grow louder as the players bow or blow harder and also vary their tone with different bowing and other techniques.

I prefer the symphonic version for the power and texture as described above, however I was surprised at how good the piece sounds on the piano and I suspect I will listen to this again many times. I might even have a go at playing it. It might start to sound passable in a decade or so….

National Identity

Isaac Albéniz
Chants d’Espagne, Op. 232
http://manchesterlib.naxosmusiclibrary.com/streamw.asp?ver=2.0&s=101977%2Fmancheslibnml11%2F1797438

No. 1. Prelude
I am very confused when this track starts up. I am familiar with this piano piece as it has been transcribed for classical guitar, and in guitar music it is known as ‘Leyenda’, and less commonly as ‘Asturias’. I was under the impression that this piece belonged in ‘Iberia – Suite Española No. 1’ (for piano) – not ‘chants d’Espagne’. Anyway, Wikipedia clarifies the issue somewhat:

In 1883 he met the teacher and composer Felip Pedrell, who inspired him to write Spanish music such as the Chants d’Espagne. The first movement (Prelude) of that suite, later retitled after the composer’s death as Asturias (Leyenda)…

Additionally, the first paragraph of the liner notes states:

“Pity the musicologists who have tried to make a catalogue of works by Isaac Albeniz, only to find themselves faced with almost insoluble problems. It is practically impossible to make an exhaustive list of the Spanish composers works, and moreover the Opus numbers have been assigned in an arbitrary fashion and do not permit any sort of precise dating. In addition, Albeniz paid such scant regard to his youthful works that he never supervised their publication – which, as one might imagine, became completely disorganised. The titanic task was nevertheless taken on by Jacinto Torres, who in 2001 published his ‘catálogo sistemático descriptivo de las obras musicales de Isaac albeniz’ “.

Anyhow – one of my favourite pieces of classical guitar music. Albéniz does such a good job of composing guitar music for the piano that it translates very naturally to the guitar, and seems very idiomatic of the instrument. Another thing I find slightly odd is the alternative title of ‘Asturias’ which is the name of a region in northern Spain, yet the music of the piece does not really fit this region. To me the music is more evocative of southern Spain and the Andalucía region. I think it’s brilliant and is entirely successful in evoking the musical spirit of Spain. Pretty much like all the other pieces of Chants d’Espagne.

Orientale
The reference to the Spanish guitar is completely evident from the outset of the piece and the use of the Phrygian mode and motifs reinforce this impresssion. The title is again somewhat deceptive. Sounds like Spain and Andalucia to me. Quite syncopated with changes of tempo so that it’s difficult to figure out the time signature (3/8 – I had to check the score!).

Under the palm tree
Sounds quite dancelike and I think at first of the tango but in fact it’s a habanera. Quite syncopated, again with the same spanish guitar feel. It’s the way chords are played followed by little melodic motifs that give this impression.

Cordoba
Slightly more languid feel at the start. It gets very hot in Cordoba!
Very evocative of the Flamenco guitar with lines that sound in the upper register and echoed in a lower register very much in the style of flamenco guitar as well as other other techniques such as fast arpeggios that are idiomatic of the instrument. It actually ‘swings’ a little and has some bouncy rhythms. Paradoxically this also sounds like the most pianistic piece of the bunch. Slightly reminiscent of Chopin?

Seguidilla
Grove informs us that the Seguidilla is ‘A Spanish dance and song…The modern seguidilla is in moderately quick triple time, usually in a major key; the melody ordinarily begins on an off-beat and cadences with melismas comparable with those of other modern Spanish folksongs.
Again the sound of the spanish guitar comes through the work with the use of fast arpeggios and strum-like lively chords.

What musical features might express an English identity?

The first things that spring to mind in conjuring an English identity are a green and pleasant land and Morris dancing. Cliche? Perhaps. But it serves as a starting point and in a way dance and geography form an important part of any national identity. So therefore something both folk-like and dance-like for England. Scarborough Fair comes to mind from the folk tradition (though you wouldn’t dance to it), and something like Vaughan-Williams choral work, ‘Folksongs of the 4 seasons’, and perhaps Holst’s ‘Jupiter’ from The Planets. The slower bit from which the hymn is derived seems quintessentially English somehow, but even some of the livelier parts could be danced to. One of the things I have picked up over the years is that the Dorian mode gets used quite a lot in English folk and Scarborough Fair is one of those songs in this mode.

Think of a folk song or nursery rhyme that you know, such as Greensleeves, Ring o’ Roses, London’s Burning, Frère Jacques or similar. What is your earliest memory of this song? Who taught it to you – and have you taught it to anyone else? Are these songs being passed on to future generations or are they starting to die out? If you can, do a straw poll of any children that you know and find out how well (if at all) they know your chosen song – or any other traditional song.
How do you think a new folk song develops? Suggest some contemporary songs which might become the folk songs of the future. How might the oral tradition of folk songs be preserved? Think about the structure of your chosen song. How many phrases are there? Are there any repeated sections? Try to describe the structure of the melody in as much detail as you can. Is your chosen song connected with any particular country or region?

Frère Jacques is the song that immediately comes to mind. Quite how I know it, I don’t know. As I spent my childhood in France I’m sure I would have come across this in school, along with other traditional french tunes – Alouette, Sur le pont D’Avignon, Le bon roi Dagobert… I also know some English nursery rhymes but nowhere near as many as some native english friends I have spoken to.

Frère Jacques is a round where each phrase is repeated in a AA BB CC DD pattern where AB could be described as the antecedent and CD as the consequent. Illustrated as below. The antecedent and consequent are balanced phrases with the antecedent rising as a question and being answered by the consequent. The harmony stays on a single chord but you could put V on ‘dang’.

Antecedent
A – Frère Jacques, frère Jacques,
B – Dormez-vous? Dormez-vous?

Consequent
C – Sonnez les matines! Sonnez les matines!
D – Ding, dang, dong. Ding, dang, dong.

It is of French origin but known in the UK as well.

In terms of how folks-songs develop, I guess they need to be simple but memorable tunes perhaps written to commemorate something, for a special occasion, or celebratory in some way e.g. Sur le pont d’Avignon and Christmas carols.

I don’t know that many children but from a small pool (of teenagers) it seems that the oral tradition is alive and well, and kids still know plenty of these traditional nursery rhymes. Everyone knows Frère Jacques it seems.

As for what modern song could become a traditional folk song or nursery rhyme in future, I honestly don’t think that anything written in the last 50 years, let alone anything more recent, is going to become a ‘traditional’ song. I mean there are enough existing songs and rhymes that suit the purpose, and it would have to be very good to displace the existing traditional songs. The first thought that springs to mind is ‘Yellow Submarine’ by the Beatles but it’s rather wordy. Maybe some Christmas songs or birthday songs such as ‘Merry Xmas’ by Slade or ‘Happy Birthday’ by Stevie Wonder.